The purpose of the present study was to predict the degree of daughter’s self-differentiation from mOTHERS’ self-differentiation. For this purpose, 157 students from Islamic Azad University of Gachsaran randomly selected responded the self-differentiation questionnaire. Data was analyzed WITH Pearson correlation and regression analysis. The results showed that there is a positive significant correlation among mOTHERS and daughters’ self-differentiation and its subscales such as emotional reaction, emotional cutoff, FUSION WITH OTHERS, and I position. Also, self-differentiation and its subscales such as emotional reaction, emotional cutoff, FUSION WITH OTHERS, and I position in the mOTHERS are able to predict these variables in their daughters.

Philadelphia chromosome can be founding 95% of patients WITH chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) by cytogenetic studies. The fused bcr/abl is transcribed in two types of chimeric mRNA. RT-PCR amplification of these two transcripts have been designed to give two different size products. This assay can detect one positive bcr/abl expressing cell in a back ground of 106 negative bcr/abl cells. The power of this assay is the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) between 6-12 months following bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is an independent and significant factor that predicts the relapse in future. The aim of optimization was to detect β2 microglobulin (β 2M) mRNA. Detection of β2 mRNA and absence of bcr/abl indicates that the patient is negative for MRD and as a result, there is molecular remission in addition to clinical remission. To monitor MRD we tested a patient's blood sample who had tolerated allogenic BMT 7 years ago. bcr/abl wasn't detected in this patient and only β2 M was observed. This result confirmed the absence of MRD in this case. To effectively monitor minimal leukemic activity after BMT, we used a competitive RT- PCR to quantify expression of the characteristic bcr/abl FUSION gene mRNA in patients WITH CML.    

Background and Aim: The epidemic of HIV/AIDS is a well-recognized global phenomenon and the most serious of infectious disease challenges to public health. The number of people living WITH HIV (PLWH) has increased in all Asian regions, including Iran. It can damage all physical, social, spiritual, psychological and financial aspects of human function. The present research was designed and conducted to better understand the interactions of people living WITH HIV/AIDS.Materials and Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using an interpretative phenomenological approach. In-depth, audio-taped and semi-structured interviews WITH 19 participants were used to collect data. Questions were open-ended and largely discovery-oriented. Interviews were audio-taped and transcriptions were analyzed to highlight the participants’ life experiences. Observations were also recorded in comprehensive field notes. A hermeneutic approach was used to analyze the data.Results: According to the findings, 19 participants were between 21 and 56 years of age; 24.1% single, 47.4% had CD4 counts under 200 cells/mm3 and OTHERS WITH earlier phase of HIV infection. Four main themes emerged: (a) beliefs (b) supportive tent, (c) different behaviors and (d) mutual reactions, including some sub-themes.Conclusions: Other people's behaviors are understood differently for PLWH in such a way that some behaviors are threatening. Other negative behaviors in some aspects have been accepted and most of them have had negative impacts on their reactions. Therefore, people WITH HIV/AIDS diagnosis face many challenges. Improving the level of awareness and OTHERS' attitudes and strengthening appropriate interaction are suggested.

Since it appears that each individual can freely exercise their right in any form they choose—even if this leads to harm to another—and since one may accept another's apparent intention as genuine WITHout investigating their true motives, which may in fact be flawed and result in injury to OTHERS, the objective of this study is, first, to identify the harms arising from exercising a right WITH the intent to cause damage to OTHERS, and to explore its dimensions and criteria WITHin Imamiyyah jurisprudence and legal frameworks, based on the documentation of the la-zarar (no harm) rule and the views of jurists and legal scholars. Second, it aims to delineate the scope of exercising rights, legal theories, and the resolution of disputes. The use of specific cases also assists in better analyzing the subject and identifying the standards for exercising rights WITH the intent to cause harm. This research, which is a scientific study, investigates a novel topic and considers Article 40 of the Constitution. The study attempts to determine the criteria for exercising a right WITH harmful intent. These criteria include social purpose, significant harm, wrongful conduct, conflict, lack of legitimate benefit, preference of interests, and fault—each of which, if left unchecked, can lead to dispute. What is central to all these criteria is the issue of intent to harm. One of the findings of this study is that the la-zarar rule has a scope as vast as the domain of rights themselves. It can encompass any exercise of privilege, priority, or preference as instances of intent to harm. Consequently, given that this issue is not explicitly addressed in existing legislation, and that in doctrinal discussions the concept of intent is rarely defined by jurists—who tend instead to focus on the consequences of its absence—it is possible, through an examination of cases involving the exercise of rights WITH harmful intent, to derive the criteria for such actions. This can ultimately guide society toward justice and rightful conduct.

The submission of useful and methodical research papers is subject to the strict observance of common rules and criteria, the violation of which leads to the production of defective and undesirable research works. Criticism of writings that have been provided WITHout considering the accepted scientific criteria in writing research articles and revealing their errors and shortcomings undoubtedly has an effect on improving the quality of research and writings of the researchers. Therefore, in the present article, by reviewing a number of writings by one of the prolific authors, some of the anomalous research methods and sources in writing scientific articles are evaluated and criticized, including, large adaptations of the works of other researchers and combining authorship and translation, vague and inaccurate citations and plagiarism due to improper citations, recycling of previously published material in new articles or self-citations, repeated republishing of an article or book in various forms (essay making and bookmaking), providing inaccurate translations and applying excessive free translation; having Improper role of authorship for himself in providing research works and ignoring the rights of the original owners of ideas, as well as disorganized composition and hasty writing WITH immature and inadequate style.